IceRiver KS3M vs Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 83% more hashrate (6.0 vs 11.0 TH/s) in the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus's favour. The IceRiver KS3M claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS3M and Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 83% more hashrate (6.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3M 6% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 42% better efficacité (567 vs 327 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3M 1% better weight (14.4 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 6% more heat output (11,601 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3M 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,294 |
| -$7.94 | Daily net profit | -$8.24 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$10,303 |
| -$14,299 | Net after 2 years | -$13,312 |
| -$17,199 | Net after 3 years | -$16,321 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3MScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS3M or the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3M is more profitable at $-7.94/day compared to $-8.24/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS3M vs Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
IceRiver KS3M vs Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS3M scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3M and Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 239.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (567 vs 327 J/TH).