SuperScalar K10 vs Goldshell KA BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.2 TH/s |
| 1,845 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 339.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Goldshell KA BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KA BOX edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 339 J/TH) in the Goldshell KA BOX's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The SuperScalar K10 and Goldshell KA BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KA BOX 2522% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 78% better power draw (1,845 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 339 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX 69% better weight (8.3 vs 2.6 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 361% more heat output (6,295 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 121% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $305 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$0.92 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$640 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$975 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$1,310 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX339.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
SuperScalar K10 vs Goldshell KA BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
SuperScalar K10 vs Goldshell KA BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell KA BOX is quieter at 55 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
SuperScalar K10 vs Goldshell KA BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
SuperScalar K10 vs Goldshell KA BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,661.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 339 J/TH).