SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 1,845 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 500 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 95% better power draw (1,845 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 70% better weight (8.3 vs 2.5 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 1745% more heat output (6,295 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 ProScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the SuperScalar K10 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the SuperScalar K10 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro on J/TH?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 500 J/TH).