Thewindminer K9 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Thewindminer K9 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 10.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 320.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 14.8 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Thewindminer | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Thewindminer K9
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 85% better power draw (3,300 vs 500 W). The Thewindminer K9 holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Thewindminer K9 and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Thewindminer K9 415% more hashrate (10.3 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 85% better power draw (3,300 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 22% better efficacité (320 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 66% better weight (14.8 vs 5.0 kg)
- Thewindminer K9 560% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 182% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Thewindminer K9 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $15,429 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$7.55 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$18,185 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$20,940 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$23,696 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Thewindminer K9 or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-7.55/day for the Thewindminer K9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Thewindminer K9 or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Thewindminer K9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Thewindminer K9 or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Thewindminer K9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Thewindminer K9 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Thewindminer K9 runs at 320.4 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 70.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 22% better efficacité (320 vs 250 J/TH).