Goldshell KA BOX vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KA BOX | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 339.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KA BOX
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KA BOX comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 89% better power draw (400 vs 3,600 W) in the Goldshell KA BOX's favour. The Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell KA BOX and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 790% more hashrate (1.2 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 89% better power draw (400 vs 3,600 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX 1% better efficacité (339 vs 343 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX 82% better weight (2.6 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 800% more heat output (1,365 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 107% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell KA BOX | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $305 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$0.92 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$640 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$975 | Net after 2 years | -$11,571 |
| -$1,310 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX339.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell KA BOX or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell KA BOX or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Goldshell KA BOX is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell KA BOX vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell KA BOX and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) on J/TH?
The Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 3.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficacité (339 vs 343 J/TH).