Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Iceriver KAS KS5M

Iceriver KAS KS5M

Taux de hachage 15.0 TH/s Puissance 3,400 W Efficiency 226.7 J/TH
VS
Dragonball Miner KS6

Dragonball Miner KS6

Taux de hachage 11.0 TH/s Puissance 3,400 W Efficiency 309.1 J/TH

Iceriver KAS KS5M vs Dragonball Miner KS6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Iceriver KAS KS5M Specification Dragonball Miner KS6
15.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 11.0 TH/s
3,400 W Consommation électrique 3,400 W
226.7 J/TH Efficiency 309.1 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
15.0 kg Weight 14.5 kg
11,601 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme KHeavyHash
IceRiver Manufacturer Dragonball

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Iceriver KAS KS5M

Daily Revenue 0.00000690 BTC $0.54
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.62
Monthly -$228.60
Yearly -$2,781.35

Dragonball Miner KS6

Daily Revenue 0.00000506 BTC $0.40
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.76
Monthly -$232.92
Yearly -$2,833.90

Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS5M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 3 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 36% more hashrate (15.0 vs 11.0 TH/s). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Iceriver KAS KS5M — l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Iceriver KAS KS5M and Dragonball Miner KS6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Iceriver KAS KS5M 36% more hashrate (15.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KAS KS5M 27% better efficacité (227 vs 309 J/TH)
  • Dragonball Miner KS6 3% better weight (15.0 vs 14.5 kg)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Iceriver KAS KS5M Metric Dragonball Miner KS6
$449 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,820
-$7.62 Daily net profit -$7.76
-$3,230 Net after 1 year -$6,654
-$6,012 Net after 2 years -$9,488
-$8,793 Net after 3 years -$12,322
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Iceriver KAS KS5M

226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Iceriver KAS KS5M or the Dragonball Miner KS6?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS5M is more profitable at $-7.62/day compared to $-7.76/day for the Dragonball Miner KS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Iceriver KAS KS5M or the Dragonball Miner KS6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Iceriver KAS KS5M vs Dragonball Miner KS6: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS5M and Dragonball Miner KS6 on J/TH?

The Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner KS6 runs at 309.1 J/TH — a difference of 82.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficacité (227 vs 309 J/TH).