Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 119.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 86% better power draw (500 vs 3,600 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite's favour. The Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite and Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 162% more hashrate (4.2 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 86% better power draw (500 vs 3,600 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 64% better efficacité (119 vs 327 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% better weight (4.0 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 620% more heat output (1,706 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 107% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,294 |
| -$1.05 | Daily net profit | -$8.24 |
| -$1,082 | Net after 1 year | -$10,303 |
| -$1,465 | Net after 2 years | -$13,312 |
| -$1,847 | Net after 3 years | -$16,321 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-8.24/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 208.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (119 vs 327 J/TH).