Iceriver KS1 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KS1 | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KS1
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 950% more hashrate (1.0 vs 10.5 TH/s). The Iceriver KS1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver KS1 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 950% more hashrate (1.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 83% better power draw (600 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 43% better efficacité (600 vs 343 J/TH)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 3% better weight (14.9 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 500% more heat output (2,047 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 47% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KS1 | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$711 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$1,224 | Net after 2 years | -$11,571 |
| -$1,736 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver KS1 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver KS1 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KS1 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver KS1 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) on J/TH?
The Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 257.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (600 vs 343 J/TH).