Iceriver KS3 vs Iceriver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KS3 | Specification | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KS3
Iceriver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS5L, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 50% more hashrate (8.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS3 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KS3 and Iceriver KS5L sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS5L 50% more hashrate (8.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS5L 29% better efficacité (400 vs 283 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 10% better weight (13.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KS5L 6% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KS3 | Metric | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $730 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $400 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$3,428 | Net after 1 year | -$3,221 |
| -$6,126 | Net after 2 years | -$6,041 |
| -$8,824 | Net after 3 years | -$8,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KS3 or the Iceriver KS5L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.73/day for the Iceriver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KS3 or the Iceriver KS5L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KS3 or Iceriver KS5L?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KS3 and Iceriver KS5L?
The Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 116.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficacité (400 vs 283 J/TH).