PiAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| PiAxe | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 30.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| 30 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.2 kg | Weight | 9,000.0 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
PiAxe
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Based on BTC price of $78,215 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the PiAxe comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,400.0 W). That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the PiAxe and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T 5900% more hashrate (0.5 vs 30.0 TH/s)
- PiAxe 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,400.0 W)
- PiAxe 63% better efficacité (30.0 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- PiAxe 100% better weight (0.2 vs 9,000.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T 15894% more heat output (51.2 vs 8,188.8 BTU/hr)
- PiAxe 169% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| PiAxe | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $200 |
| -$0.02 | Daily net profit | -$4.68 |
| -$86 | Net after 1 year | -$1,908 |
| -$92 | Net after 2 years | -$3,617 |
| -$99 | Net after 3 years | -$5,325 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PiAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
PiAxe30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
PiAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-4.68/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the PiAxe or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?
The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
PiAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T: which fits a residential setup better?
The PiAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between PiAxe and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?
The PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 50.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (30.0 vs 80.0 J/TH).
Compare PiAxe with...
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator