PiAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| PiAxe | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 32.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 68.8 J/TH |
| 30 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.2 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
PiAxe
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le PiAxe l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,200.0 W). That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the PiAxe and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 6300% more hashrate (0.5 vs 32.0 TH/s)
- PiAxe 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,200.0 W)
- PiAxe 56% better efficacité (30.0 vs 68.8 J/TH)
- PiAxe 100% better weight (0.2 vs 7,500.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 14561% more heat output (51.2 vs 7,506.4 BTU/hr)
- PiAxe 169% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| PiAxe | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,266 |
| -$0.02 | Daily net profit | -$4.13 |
| -$86 | Net after 1 year | -$2,773 |
| -$92 | Net after 2 years | -$4,280 |
| -$99 | Net after 3 years | -$5,787 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PiAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
PiAxe30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the PiAxe or Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-4.13/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
PiAxe vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T: which runs at a lower noise level?
The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the PiAxe or Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
The PiAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the PiAxe and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T on J/TH?
The PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T runs at 68.8 J/TH — a difference of 38.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (30.0 vs 68.8 J/TH).
Compare PiAxe with...
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator