Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| 2,000.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 32.0 TH/s |
| 2,500 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 1,250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 68.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 22.0 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 8,530 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Based on BTC price of $64,316 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (1,250,000.0 vs 68.8 J/TH). That said, the Innosilicon A11 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A11 Pro and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T sit on each measurable spec:
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 1599900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 32.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 12% better power draw (2,500 vs 2,200 W)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 100% better efficacité (1,250,000.0 vs 68.8 J/TH)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 66% better weight (22.0 vs 7.5 kg)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 14% more heat output (8,530 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 54% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| $4,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,266 |
| -$6.00 | Daily net profit | -$4.35 |
| -$6,190 | Net after 1 year | -$2,853 |
| -$8,380 | Net after 2 years | -$4,440 |
| -$10,570 | Net after 3 years | -$6,028 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A11 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T68.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro or Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T is more profitable at $-4.35/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A11 Pro or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro runs at 1,250,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T runs at 68.8 J/TH — a difference of 1,249,931.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,250,000.0 vs 68.8 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
