Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon T3+ 52T | Specification | Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) |
|---|---|---|
| 52.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 112.0 TH/s |
| 2,800 W | Consommation électrique | 3,472 W |
| 53.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 31.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 10,000.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 9,554 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,847 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon T3+ 52T
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 115% more hashrate (52.0 vs 112.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)'s favour. The Innosilicon T3+ 52T claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon T3+ 52T and Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 115% more hashrate (52.0 vs 112.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T 19% better power draw (2,800 vs 3,472 W)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 42% better efficacité (53.9 vs 31.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 100% better weight (10,000.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 24% more heat output (9,554 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 127% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon T3+ 52T | Metric | Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$4.85 | Daily net profit | -$4.30 |
| -$1,769 | Net after 1 year | -$4,570 |
| -$3,539 | Net after 2 years | -$6,139 |
| -$5,308 | Net after 3 years | -$7,709 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)Score: 50/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)31.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) is more profitable at $-4.30/day compared to $-4.85/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro): which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 22.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (53.9 vs 31.0 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon T3+ 52T with...
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
Compare Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) with...
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) vs MicroBT Whatsminer D1
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M20S
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21S
