MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer D1 | Specification | Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) |
|---|---|---|
| 48.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 112.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,472 W |
| 45.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 31.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 8,500.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,847 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer D1
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 133% more hashrate (48.0 vs 112.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 133% more hashrate (48.0 vs 112.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer D1 37% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,472 W)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 32% better efficacité (45.8 vs 31.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 58% more heat output (7,506 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) 92% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer D1 | Metric | Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$3.55 | Daily net profit | -$4.30 |
| -$1,297 | Net after 1 year | -$4,571 |
| -$2,594 | Net after 2 years | -$6,141 |
| -$3,891 | Net after 3 years | -$7,712 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)Score: 50/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)31.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 is more profitable at $-3.55/day compared to $-4.30/day for the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro): which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer D1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro)?
The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 runs at 45.8 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ (Hydro) runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 14.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (45.8 vs 31.0 J/TH).
