iPollo V1 Mini vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 GH/s |
| 240 W | Consommation électrique | 550 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 2,100.0 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-QE comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 483% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X16-QE's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Mini and Jasminer X16-QE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Jasminer X16-QE 483% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini 56% better power draw (240 vs 550 W)
- Jasminer X16-QE 61% better efficacité (800,000 vs 314,286 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-QE 100% better weight (2,100.0 vs 10.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-QE 129% more heat output (819 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-QE 110% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Mini | Metric | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| $300 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $469 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$510 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$720 | Net after 2 years | -$1,433 |
| -$931 | Net after 3 years | -$1,914 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QEScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Mini vs Jasminer X16-QE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.32/day for the Jasminer X16-QE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini vs Jasminer X16-QE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iPollo V1 Mini vs Jasminer X16-QE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini vs Jasminer X16-QE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 485,714.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (800,000 vs 314,286 J/TH).