iPollo V2X vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V2X | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 GH/s |
| 165 W | Consommation électrique | 550 W |
| 137,500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 1.7 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 563 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 61/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V2X
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V2X, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 70% better power draw (165 vs 550 W) in the iPollo V2X's favour. The Jasminer X16-QE claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V2X and Jasminer X16-QE sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-QE 46% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2X 70% better power draw (165 vs 550 W)
- iPollo V2X 56% better efficacité (137,500 vs 314,286 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-QE 27% better noise (55.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- iPollo V2X 83% better weight (1.7 vs 10.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-QE 233% more heat output (563 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-QE 7% more score de minage domestique (61.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V2X | Metric | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| $990 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $469 |
| -$0.40 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$1,135 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$1,279 | Net after 2 years | -$1,433 |
| -$1,424 | Net after 3 years | -$1,914 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QEScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2X137,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V2X or the Jasminer X16-QE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2X is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-1.32/day for the Jasminer X16-QE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V2X or Jasminer X16-QE?
The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V2X at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V2X or the Jasminer X16-QE?
The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 61/100 for the iPollo V2X). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V2X and Jasminer X16-QE?
The iPollo V2X runs at 137,500.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 176,785.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (137,500 vs 314,286 J/TH).