Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) | Specification | iPollo V1 |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.6 GH/s |
| 960 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 1,920,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 861,111.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 13,000.0 kg |
| 3,276 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
iPollo V1
Based on BTC price of $75,294 and current network difficulty as of Mar 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V1 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Le Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1861,111.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or iPollo V1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) is more profitable at $-2.30/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or iPollo V1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or iPollo V1?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and iPollo V1?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,058,888.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster