Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 750.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 550 W |
| 1,800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-QE edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 83% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 314,286 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and Jasminer X16-QE sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-QE 133% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-QE 59% better power draw (1,350 vs 550 W)
- Jasminer X16-QE 83% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 314,286 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-QE 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 10.0 kg)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 145% more heat output (4,606 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-QE 110% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Metric | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| $800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $469 |
| -$3.24 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$1,983 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 2 years | -$1,433 |
| -$4,348 | Net after 3 years | -$1,914 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QEScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Jasminer X16-QE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the Jasminer X16-QE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or Jasminer X16-QE?
The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and Jasminer X16-QE?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,485,714.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 314,286 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster