Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster | Specification | Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) |
|---|---|---|
| 620.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.0 GH/s |
| 750 W | Consommation électrique | 3,420 W |
| 1,209,677.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 310,909.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 3,830.0 kg | Weight | 16.1 kg |
| 2,559 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster
Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1674% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster and Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) sit on each measurable spec:
- Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 1674% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster 78% better power draw (750 vs 3,420 W)
- Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 74% better efficacité (1,209,677 vs 310,909 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 100% better weight (3,830.0 vs 16.1 kg)
- Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 356% more heat output (2,559 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster | Metric | Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $950 |
| -$1.80 | Daily net profit | -$8.21 |
| -$4,157 | Net after 1 year | -$3,946 |
| -$4,814 | Net after 2 years | -$6,942 |
| -$5,471 | Net after 3 years | -$9,937 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)310,909.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Elphapex DG 1 (11GH): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster is more profitable at $-1.80/day compared to $-8.21/day for the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Elphapex DG 1 (11GH): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Elphapex DG 1 (11GH): which fits a residential setup better?
The Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Elphapex DG 1 (11GH): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster runs at 1,209,677.4 J/TH while the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) runs at 310,909.1 J/TH — a difference of 898,768.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (1,209,677 vs 310,909 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster with...
- Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator