Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell CK Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 3.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell CK Box II
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK Box II, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 38181718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.1 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell CK Box II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK Box II 38181718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 84% better power draw (65.0 vs 400.0 W)
- Goldshell CK Box II 100% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 89% better weight (0.3 vs 3.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK Box II 515% more heat output (222 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 109% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell CK Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $246 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.88 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$569 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$892 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$1,215 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Box II190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK Box II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.88/day for the Goldshell CK Box II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK Box II: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Box II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK Box II?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell CK Box II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell CK Box II?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Box II runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,991.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 190 J/TH).