Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell CK Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 3.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell CK Box II
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK Box II l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK Box II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK Box II 583233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Box II 88% better power draw (3,300 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell CK Box II 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK Box II 78% better weight (13.5 vs 3.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 725% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 47% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell CK Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $246 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.88 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$569 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$892 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,215 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Box II190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK Box II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Box II is more profitable at $-0.88/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK Box II?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Box II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell CK Box II?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell CK Box II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK Box II?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Box II runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,476.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH).