Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell CK Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 3.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell CK Box II
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK Box II edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 5675576% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.1 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell CK Box II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK Box II 5675576% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 10% better power draw (360 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell CK Box II 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 23% better weight (2.3 vs 3.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK Box II 11% more heat output (1,228 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 103% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell CK Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $246 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.88 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$569 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$892 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$1,215 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Box II190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK Box II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-0.88/day for the Goldshell CK Box II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell CK Box II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Box II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell CK Box II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell CK Box II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell CK Box II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Box II runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,539.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 190 J/TH).