Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell E-DG1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 529,411.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell E-DG1M
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell E-DG1M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 61718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Card holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell E-DG1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-DG1M 61718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 96% better power draw (65.0 vs 1,800.0 W)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 96% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 529,412 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 22% better noise (35.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Card 98% better weight (0.3 vs 16.0 kg)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 2669% more heat output (222 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 27% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,376 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$5,529 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-DG1M529,411.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell E-DG1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-4.32/day for the Goldshell E-DG1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell E-DG1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-DG1M at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell E-DG1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-DG1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell E-DG1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 11,288,770.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 96% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 529,412 J/TH).