Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell E-DG1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 529,411.8 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell E-DG1M
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell E-DG1M edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 91% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 529,412 J/TH) in the Goldshell E-DG1M's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-DG1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-DG1M 530% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 44% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 91% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 529,412 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 47% better noise (85.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max II 22% better weight (12.5 vs 16.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 78% more heat output (10,918 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 93% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,376 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$5,529 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-DG1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-DG1M529,411.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell E-DG1M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-DG1M is more profitable at $-4.32/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell E-DG1M?
The Goldshell E-DG1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell E-DG1M?
The Goldshell E-DG1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-DG1M on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 5,396,514.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 529,412 J/TH).