Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell E-DG1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 529,411.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell E-DG1M
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-DG1M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 9089% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell E-DG1M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-DG1M 9089% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 80% better power draw (360 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 95% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 529,412 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 22% better noise (35.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 86% better weight (2.3 vs 16.0 kg)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 400% more heat output (1,228 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 23% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$2,376 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$5,529 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-DG1M529,411.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell E-DG1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-4.32/day for the Goldshell E-DG1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell E-DG1M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-DG1M at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell E-DG1M?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-DG1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell E-DG1M on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 9,200,318.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 529,412 J/TH).