Goldshell AE Max II vs Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,666,666.7 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,083 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 84% better power draw (3,200 vs 500 W). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AE Max II 80% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 84% better power draw (3,200 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 72% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,666,667 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 47% better noise (85.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 68% better weight (12.5 vs 4.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 540% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 114% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $979 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$1,417 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,855 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$2,293 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE1 LiteScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite1,666,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 4,259,259.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,666,667 J/TH).