Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell DG Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell DG Max |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.5 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,450 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 530,769.2 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,771 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell DG Max
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell DG Max l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1104% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell DG Max's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell DG Max sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell DG Max 1104% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 7% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,450 W)
- Goldshell DG Max 91% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 530,769 J/TH)
- Goldshell DG Max 6% better noise (85.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Goldshell DG Max 32% better weight (12.5 vs 8.5 kg)
- Goldshell DG Max 8% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,771 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell DG Max |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,399 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$8.28 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$4,421 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$7,443 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$10,465 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell DG Max530,769.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell DG Max: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Max II is more profitable at $-7.68/day compared to $-8.28/day for the Goldshell DG Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell DG Max: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell DG Max is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell DG Max?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell DG Max: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell DG Max runs at 530,769.2 J/TH — a difference of 5,395,156.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 530,769 J/TH).