Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell CK-LITE
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK-LITE comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH) in the Goldshell CK-LITE's favour. The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK-LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK-LITE 1749900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 64% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 15% better noise (55.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 44% better weight (13.5 vs 7.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 175% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 4% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$1,568 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$2,537 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$3,505 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-LITEScore: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-LITE190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-LITE is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-LITE at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell CK-LITE scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK-LITE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,476.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH).