Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell CK-LITE
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK-LITE l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 17026927% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK-LITE's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell CK-LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK-LITE 17026927% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 70% better power draw (360 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 46% better noise (35.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 69% better weight (2.3 vs 7.5 kg)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 233% more heat output (1,228 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 33% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$1,568 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$2,537 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$3,505 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-LITE190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell CK-LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Goldshell CK-LITE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-LITE at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Goldshell CK-LITE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,539.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 190 J/TH).