Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell LT6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell LT6 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 955,223.9 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 12,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell LT6
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell LT6 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 90% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 955,224 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell LT6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell LT6 831% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell LT6 3% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,200 W)
- Goldshell LT6 90% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 955,224 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 12,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 3% more heat output (11,260 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 127% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell LT6 |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $970 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$7.68 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$3,773 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$6,576 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$9,379 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT6955,223.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell LT6?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LT6 is more profitable at $-7.68/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell LT6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell LT6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell LT6?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell LT6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell LT6 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell LT6 runs at 955,223.9 J/TH — a difference of 8,211,442.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 955,224 J/TH).