Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell LT6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell LT6 |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 955,223.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 12,500.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell LT6
Based on BTC price of $78,126 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell LT6 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 8954% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell LT6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell LT6 8954% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 89% better power draw (360 vs 3,200 W)
- Goldshell LT6 90% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 955,224 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% better weight (2.3 vs 12,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell LT6 789% more heat output (1,228 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 214% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell LT6 |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $970 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.68 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,773 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$6,576 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$9,379 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT6955,223.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell LT6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell LT6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell LT6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell LT6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell LT6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell LT6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell LT6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell LT6 runs at 955,223.9 J/TH — a difference of 8,774,505.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 955,224 J/TH).