Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS1 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 600 J/TH). That said, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS1 138789% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 54% better power draw (1,300 vs 600 W)
- IceRiver KS1 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 8% better noise (60.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS1 3% better weight (15.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 117% more heat output (4,436 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 2% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the IceRiver KS1 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS1?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 51/100 for the IceRiver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,804,955.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 600 J/TH).