Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver AL3 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). That said, the IceRiver KS1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 1400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 83% better power draw (3,500 vs 600 W)
- Iceriver AL3 61% better efficacité (233 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS1 6% better weight (16.0 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 483% more heat output (11,942 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 42% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver KS1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS1?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS1?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 366.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (233 vs 600 J/TH).