IceRiver AL0 vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS1 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 249900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS1's favour. The IceRiver AL0 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver AL0 and IceRiver KS1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS1 249900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 83% better power draw (100 vs 600 W)
- IceRiver KS1 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 85% better noise (10.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS1 500% more heat output (341 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 39% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver AL0 or IceRiver KS1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-1.40/day for the IceRiver KS1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver AL0 vs IceRiver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the IceRiver KS1 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver AL0 vs IceRiver KS1: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 51/100 for the IceRiver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver AL0 vs IceRiver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 600 J/TH).