Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS1 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 333233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS1's favour. The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS1 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS1 333233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 17% better power draw (500 vs 600 W)
- IceRiver KS1 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 31% better noise (45.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 73% better weight (4.0 vs 15.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS1 20% more heat output (1,706 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 22% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE1 LiteScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or IceRiver KS1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-1.40/day for the IceRiver KS1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the IceRiver KS1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the IceRiver KS1 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or IceRiver KS1?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 51/100 for the IceRiver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,066.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 600 J/TH).