Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS3L edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 694344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.0 TH/s). The Iceriver AE2 720Mh holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS3L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS3L 694344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 59% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,200 W)
- IceRiver KS3L 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 640 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS3L 7% better weight (15.5 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 146% more heat output (4,436 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 44% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,500 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$7.50 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$10,237 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$12,975 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$15,712 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3L640.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS3L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS3L?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS3L: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS3L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,804,915.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 640 J/TH).