Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS3L edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.0 TH/s). The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS3L actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3L 1666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 84% better power draw (500 vs 3,200 W)
- IceRiver KS3L 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 640 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 40% better noise (45.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 72% better weight (4.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 540% more heat output (1,706 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 72% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,500 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$7.50 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$10,237 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$12,975 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$15,712 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE1 LiteScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3L640.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the IceRiver KS3L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS3L: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or IceRiver KS3L?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS3L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,026.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 640 J/TH).