Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,580 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS3L comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 640 J/TH) in the IceRiver KS3L's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and IceRiver KS3L sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS3L 249900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3L 11% better power draw (3,580 vs 3,200 W)
- IceRiver KS3L 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 640 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 4% better weight (15.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 12% more heat output (12,215 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3L 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,500 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$7.50 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$10,237 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$12,975 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$15,712 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3LScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3L640.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the IceRiver KS3L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3L is more profitable at $-7.50/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or IceRiver KS3L?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver KS3L: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS3L scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and IceRiver KS3L?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,360.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 640 J/TH).