Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver AL3 l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 200% more hashrate (15.0 vs 5.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. The IceRiver KS3L claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS3L sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AL3 200% more hashrate (15.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3L 9% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver AL3 64% better efficacité (233 vs 640 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 10% better weight (16.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,500 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.50 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$10,237 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$12,975 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$15,712 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS3L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3L is more profitable at $-7.50/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS3L?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver KS3L?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS3L?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 406.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (233 vs 640 J/TH).