Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)
Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Iceriver AL3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) | Specification | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| 950.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 3,500 W |
| 484.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 233.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 3.1 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)
Iceriver AL3
Based on BTC price of $78,227 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1479% more hashrate (1.0 vs 15.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) and Iceriver AL3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AL3 1479% more hashrate (1.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) 87% better power draw (460 vs 3,500 W)
- Iceriver AL3 52% better efficacité (484 vs 233 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) 81% better weight (3.1 vs 16.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 661% more heat output (1,570 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AL3 6% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) | Metric | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| $299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,550 |
| -$1.07 | Daily net profit | -$7.86 |
| -$689 | Net after 1 year | -$4,419 |
| -$1,080 | Net after 2 years | -$7,288 |
| -$1,470 | Net after 3 years | -$10,157 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AL3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Iceriver AL3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) is more profitable at $-1.07/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Iceriver AL3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver AL3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) or the Iceriver AL3?
The Iceriver AL3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Iceriver AL3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) runs at 484.2 J/TH while the Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH — a difference of 250.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficacité (484 vs 233 J/TH).
Compare Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) with...
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE Card
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE Max
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE Max II
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX II
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh