Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 950.0 GH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 460 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 484.2 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 3.1 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,570 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 2567468% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) 2567468% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 22% better power draw (360 vs 460 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 484 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 26% better weight (2.3 vs 3.1 kg)
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) 28% more heat output (1,228 vs 1,570 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 103% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$1.07 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$689 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$1,080 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$1,470 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)484.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-1.07/day for the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W): which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) runs at 484.2 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,245.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 484 J/TH).
Compare Goldshell AE-BOX with...
Compare Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) with...
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE Card
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE Max
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE Max II
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX II
- Goldshell AL BOX II Pro (ALPH/ 950GH/ 460W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh