Goldshell AL Card vs Goldshell E-AL1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL Card | Specification | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| 120.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.4 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 541.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 409.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.3 kg | Weight | — |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL Card
Goldshell E-AL1M
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-AL1M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 3567% more hashrate (0.1 vs 4.4 TH/s) in the Goldshell E-AL1M's favour. That said, the Goldshell AL Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL Card and Goldshell E-AL1M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-AL1M 3567% more hashrate (0.1 vs 4.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL Card 96% better power draw (65.0 vs 1,800.0 W)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 24% better efficacité (542 vs 409 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 2669% more heat output (222 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL Card 154% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL Card | Metric | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| $111 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$4.16 |
| -$166 | Net after 1 year | -$2,318 |
| -$222 | Net after 2 years | -$3,837 |
| -$277 | Net after 3 years | -$5,356 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL Card or Goldshell E-AL1M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL Card is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-4.16/day for the Goldshell E-AL1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL Card or the Goldshell E-AL1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AL Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AL Card vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AL Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AL Card vs Goldshell E-AL1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AL Card runs at 541.7 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH — a difference of 132.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficacité (542 vs 409 J/TH).