Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver KS2
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). That said, the IceRiver KS2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS2 66% better power draw (3,500 vs 1,200 W)
- Iceriver AL3 61% better efficacité (233 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS2 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS2 6% better weight (16.0 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 192% more heat output (11,942 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS2 44% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$4,420 | Net after 1 year | -$6,025 |
| -$7,289 | Net after 2 years | -$7,050 |
| -$10,159 | Net after 3 years | -$8,075 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS2Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver KS2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS2 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS2?
The IceRiver KS2 scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS2 on J/TH?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 366.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (233 vs 600 J/TH).