Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,580 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
IceRiver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS2 comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and IceRiver KS2 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS2 99900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS2 66% better power draw (3,580 vs 1,200 W)
- IceRiver KS2 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS2 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 198% more heat output (12,215 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS2 73% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$6,025 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$7,050 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$8,075 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS2Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS2600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver KS2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or IceRiver KS2?
The IceRiver KS2 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the IceRiver KS2?
The IceRiver KS2 scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and IceRiver KS2 on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH).