Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KS3M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KS3M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3M 1999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 85% better power draw (500 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS3M 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 40% better noise (45.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 76% better weight (4.0 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 580% more heat output (1,706 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 72% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE1 LiteScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the Iceriver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KS3M on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 567 J/TH).