IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS3M, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1499900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). That said, the IceRiver AL0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KS3M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3M 1499900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS3M 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 567 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 87% better noise (10.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 85% better weight (2.5 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KS3M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KS3M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 249,433.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 567 J/TH).