Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,580 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KS3M l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 567 J/TH) in the Iceriver KS3M's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver KS3M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS3M 299900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3M 5% better power draw (3,580 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS3M 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 12% better weight (15.0 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 5% more heat output (12,215 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS3M 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS3MScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or Iceriver KS3M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3M is more profitable at $-7.94/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or Iceriver KS3M?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS3M scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,433.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 567 J/TH).