Iceriver ALPH AL0 vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALPH AL0 | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 38.0 GH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 1,458 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 64/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALPH AL0
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better efficacité (250 vs 38,368 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALPH AL0 and colengine P2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 953% more hashrate (0.4 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 93% better power draw (100 vs 1,458 W)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 99% better efficacité (250 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 38% better noise (50.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.8 kg)
- colengine P2 1358% more heat output (341 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 68% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver ALPH AL0 | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $178 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$260 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$343 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$425 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL0Score: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALPH AL0250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALPH AL0 vs colengine P2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-3.50/day for the colengine P2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALPH AL0 vs colengine P2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the colengine P2 at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALPH AL0 or the colengine P2?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 38/100 for the colengine P2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALPH AL0 vs colengine P2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 runs at 250.0 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 38,118.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (250 vs 38,368 J/TH).