Antminer D7 vs Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D7 | Specification | Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 1,286.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 600.0 MH/s |
| 3,148 W | Consommation électrique | 192 W |
| 2,447.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 320,000.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 1,720.0 kg |
| 10,741 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 655 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D7
Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer D7 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 214233% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D7 and Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer D7 214233% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner 94% better power draw (3,148 vs 192 W)
- Antminer D7 99% better efficacité (2,448 vs 320,000 J/TH)
- Antminer D7 99% better weight (14.4 vs 1,720.0 kg)
- Antminer D7 1540% more heat output (10,741 vs 655 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D7 9% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D7 | Metric | Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$7.51 | Daily net profit | -$0.46 |
| -$5,241 | Net after 1 year | -$1,168 |
| -$7,982 | Net after 2 years | -$1,336 |
| -$10,722 | Net after 3 years | -$1,505 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D7Score: 36/100. 70 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer D72,447.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer D7 or the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner is more profitable at $-0.46/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer D7 or Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner?
The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D7 or Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner?
The Antminer D7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D7 and Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner?
The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Baikal Quadruple Mini Miner runs at 320,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 317,552.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (2,448 vs 320,000 J/TH).