Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Baikal BK-D
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Specification | Baikal BK-D |
|---|---|---|
| 34.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 320.0 GH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 1,100 W |
| 52.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 3,437.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,400.0 kg | Weight | 6,500.0 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,753 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithme | Blake256r14 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)
Baikal BK-D
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 10525% more hashrate (34.0 vs 0.3 TH/s). The Baikal BK-D claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Baikal BK-D sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 10525% more hashrate (34.0 vs 0.3 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-D 39% better power draw (1,800 vs 1,100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 98% better efficacité (52.9 vs 3,437.5 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-D 31% better weight (9,400 vs 6,500 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 64% more heat output (6,142 vs 3,753 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-D 11% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Metric | Baikal BK-D |
|---|---|---|
| $2,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.10 | Daily net profit | -$2.63 |
| -$3,230 | Net after 1 year | -$959 |
| -$4,360 | Net after 2 years | -$1,919 |
| -$5,490 | Net after 3 years | -$2,878 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-DScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)52.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Baikal BK-D: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-D is more profitable at $-2.63/day compared to $-3.10/day for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Baikal BK-D: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Baikal BK-D: which fits a residential setup better?
The Baikal BK-D scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Baikal BK-D on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) runs at 52.9 J/TH while the Baikal BK-D runs at 3,437.5 J/TH — a difference of 3,384.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (52.9 vs 3,437.5 J/TH).